PLC fault analysis and troubleshooting methods - Database & Sql Blog Articles

Single chip microcomputer STM32L151CCU6

Mobile phone crystal 3.2*2.5mm 3225 26M (26.000MHZ) 7.5PF 10PPM 20PPM 30PPM

SMD aluminum electrolytic capacitor

Probe domestic switch needle KG-300K needle head diameter is 3.0mm normally open switch needle

L0504-Murata muRata common mode inductor 90Ω 150mA

When analyzing PLC process control faults, four effective methods for fault detection and resolution are presented, along with two practical examples to demonstrate the troubleshooting process. Understanding the characteristics of PLC faults is essential. A PLC control system failure refers to the loss of its intended functionality, which can be categorized into two main types: faults within the PLC itself or issues with on-site equipment such as relays, contactors, valves, and motors.

The PLC system includes components like the central processing unit, main chassis, expansion chassis, I/O modules, and network devices. On-site equipment typically involves field sensors, actuators, and other peripheral devices. Most PLC-related failures stem from interface signal problems rather than internal software issues. Therefore, during maintenance, it's crucial to verify whether the PLC program is functioning correctly or if the issue lies with the hardware interface or external components.

To effectively troubleshoot PLC faults, it’s important to first determine whether the problem is global or localized. If multiple control components are malfunctioning and numerous alarms are triggered, checking the CPU module, memory, and power supply is a logical starting point. For local faults, consider the following diagnostic approaches:

1. Use alarm information from the host computer. PLC systems have built-in self-diagnostic features that quickly identify the cause of a failure, making this an efficient and reliable method for maintenance personnel.

2. Analyze based on the sequence of operations. In automated systems, actions occur in a specific order. By observing the system’s behavior and comparing it to normal conditions, potential causes can be identified.

3. Check the status of input and output ports. Faults often manifest through these interfaces, allowing technicians to diagnose issues without delving into complex program logic.

4. Use the PLC program for diagnosis. Some faults may not generate direct alarms, but by monitoring the program’s execution, the root cause can be identified. For example, if a Pump isn’t running, checking the corresponding output port can reveal if the PLC is sending the correct signal.

While these methods are helpful, relying solely on one approach is rarely sufficient. A comprehensive analysis involving both electrical and mechanical components is often necessary. Here are two real-world examples illustrating how these techniques were applied:

Example 1: During normal operation of a heating system, an alarm was triggered, and the host computer displayed “MCC fault.” The MCC refers to the motor control center. By reviewing the circuit diagram, it was determined that the issue was related to the air switch contacts. After inspecting the power distribution room, a tripped circuit breaker was found, leading to the discovery of an overloaded motor. Fixing the impeller nut resolved the issue.

Example 2: A flow regulating valve would flash red and green after being turned off, causing an alarm. However, the system continued to function. Upon inspection, it was found that the feedback signal from the valve was missing. Reconnecting the feedback line to the normally closed contact resolved the issue, demonstrating the importance of checking both hardware and signal integrity.

In summary, diagnosing and resolving PLC faults requires a combination of technical knowledge, systematic analysis, and hands-on experience. Understanding the system’s architecture and utilizing available diagnostic tools can significantly improve efficiency and reduce downtime.